Reading and Reflection Objectives
This is an English translation of the published reading. Read "Hiroshima AI Process: International Behavioral Guidelines for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems," and pay attention to how it proposes safety, safeguards, and trustworthy development actions based on risk.
This page provides existing practice requirements. Please read first. Hiroshima AI Behavior Guidelines Complete English translation , then complete the following reflection; the entire text and the exercises serve different purposes.
Reflection task
After reading, respond:
- List three safety, security, or social risks explicitly mentioned in the document.
- List at least two recommended measures that enterprises or developers can take to develop and deploy more trustworthy systems.
Please indicate the paragraph you are basing your response on, and match the risks with the corresponding control measures. You may combine the information as needed. Trustworthy AI Ethics Framework Review, while cross-checking The full text of the guidelines The specific paragraph, cannot answer based solely on conceptual names.
This is an open-ended reflection. Private replies and personal information from the original discussion do not appear on this page and are not served as exemplary answers on the website.
Reading entry
- European Commission: Hiroshima AI Process Behavior Guidelines : English, query official guidelines and related documents, pay attention to document versions and target audience.
Related Reading
Available Trustworthy AI Framework Organize reflection, then Workflow Comprehensive Practice Whether the specific system inspection measures can be implemented.
Reference and Extended Reading
The following is an editorial addition.
- OECD AI Principles : English, to aid in understanding the broader principles underlying the guidelines.